Criminal Law and the Part a Chicago Criminal Defense Lawyer Plays in the Society

It’s commonly straightforward to distinguish a civil case from a criminal one– by evaluating the parties involved. If the document states Doe v. Smith, it’s often a civil case; but if the file says Doe v. United States or Doe v. Illinois, it’s a criminal case. It’s important to understand the difference because many people still often mix them up like a smoothie.

A criminal defense lawyer in Chicago takes on criminal claims– infractions that hurt the public like rape and murder. There’s no solitary definition of crime, but it highlights any act of transgression of the law that damages the public. This is why particular court files normally declare Doe v. United States, implying the plaintiff is the people of the United States. It can likewise work by state like Doe v. Illinois, implying the offender will confront the people of Illinois. .

In submitting a criminal case, the prosecutor of the jurisdiction where the unlawful act took place establishes whether or not the charge ought to be pursued. Because of the gravity of the lawsuit, criminal allegations have to be submitted within 72 hours if any apprehension is made. A number of states simply need charges to be submitted within 48 hours.

Compared to a civil case, a criminal case involves more than simply remuneration for damages. The offender, if verified liable, can also be imprisoned, required to carry out community service, or be subject under the capital punishment. The matter of proving the defendant’s guilt generally lies at the hands of the government that filed the complaint.

If there’s something that civil and criminal lawsuits share, it’s typically the possibility of a retrial or an appeal to reconsider the previous ruling. Nonetheless, this is already out of the hands of a typical court; appeals are currently the duty of an appellate court (or court of appeals). An appellate court will simply inspect whether or not there are incongruities with the legal proceeding in question. It can either require a fresh trial to be hosted or the case rejected entirely.

For more information about criminal lawsuits, go to the websites at Nolo.com and Diffen.com. For more details, you can visit a criminal attorney in Chicago.

An Atlanta uncontested divorce is possible

Residents in the Atlanta area who are seeking or considering divorce may wish to consult with an Atlanta divorce lawyer. Often times, divorce can be a complicated issue and even an amicable divorce may quickly develop into a quagmire as both spouses seek to come to an agreement. However, with the assistance of an attorney, it may be possible to turn the tables and secure a favorable result.

Types of Divorce

Broadly speaking, there are two different kinds of divorce: no-fault divorce and at-fault divorce. In a no-fault divorce, there is no allegation or proof needed of fault on behalf of either party. However, specific rules apply to no-fault divorces, and a period of separation may well be required before seeking the divorce.

On the other hand, an at-fault divorce is where one party committed some act that is incompatible with marriage. The most common example is that of adultery, although grounds for an at-fault divorce may exist under any number of circumstances. To determine if it is possible to seek an at-fault divorce, a divorce lawyer in Atlanta can often help with assessing your legal options.

Uncontested Divorce

In many cases, the divorce may be the result of a mutual agreement between the spouses to dissolve the marriage. This is called an uncontested divorce, and it is often more cost effective and less stressful to go through than a confrontational divorce.

Typically, spouses are already in broad agreement about the terms of the divorce before consulting with an Atlanta divorce lawyer. An Atlanta uncontested divorce may thus be the best way to go, allowing the spouses to settle any remaining issues amicably as well as reducing any preexisting agreements to paper. If no dispute exists as to issues such as property division, child custody or spousal support, court involvement need only be minimal.

In Atlanta uncontested divorces, it is strongly advised to retain the assistance of an Atlanta divorce lawyer even the filing of an uncontested divorce may seem simple. In filing for a divorce and in writing the divorce agreement, it is important that any ambiguities be resolved before both spouses sign the applicable papers. Otherwise, they may have to return to court again in the future. Working with a divorce lawyer in Atlanta may thus be more cost effective in the long term.

Contact a lawyer today

If you are considering or seeking a divorce, it is often helpful to consult with an attorney from an Atlanta Divorce Law Firm to learn your rights and obligations. Moreover, the divorce process can often be complicated, and the judicial system has a language all its own that may seem confusing if not intimidating to those not well-versed in it. By working with an experienced attorney who has deep and extensive knowledge of divorce law, it may thus be possible to successfully navigate the court system with an aim toward securing a fair result. Moreover, in an uncontested divorce, a lawyer can help with ensuring that the resulting agreement is air-tight and will not cause legal troubles down the road.

Stella And Dot Review Scam Or Legal

If youre on this page youre most likely wondering if Stella and Dot is Scam or Legal. Well this review is for you. Just like you, thousands of people are wondering the same thing.

Stella and Dot Scam?

In this review I am going to explain to you why Stella and Dot is not a scam. To be quit honest with you, I dont know or no where such claims would stipulate from. They are a modern day home based business that was intended to help create wealth for todays business women.

They have an exceptional group of leaders. One of whom is Jessica Herrin, founder and mother of two. She is so well respected as an entrepreneur that even appeared on the Oprah Winfrey Show. Leaders are imperative when it comes to determining if a company is a rip-off. Stella and Dot has some great leaders so I dont smell anything fishy there.

One of the most important factors in determining if a MLM company is a fraud or not is by looking at the products. Are they marketing at least one product? In the case of Stella and Dot, their product is what they call an irresistible jewelry line. Keeping their product in mind, there is no way they can be a scam.

Stella and Dot Scam Allegations

When searching on the internet youre going to find all kinds of articles stating that this company is illegal, or that company is one. And thats mainly because the person posting the article is not making any money in the industry and/or because they dont know how to make money in the network marketing industry. Now Im not saying that there arent any illegal businesses out there because there is. But the ones who are in the legal ones, like Stella and Dot, are having problems building their business simple because they dont know how to generate leads.

You have to understand the MLM business is a numbers game. The more people you show your opportunity too, the greater your success rate will be. The greater success you have, the more money you will make. This not only applies to Stella and Dot, but to all MLM companies.

What are the Qualities of a Really Good Colorado DUI Lawyer

When you have problems with the law, it does not matter that you need a Boulder criminal defense attorney or a Colorado DUI lawyer as long as you know who to choose. Regardless of the field that they practice in, lawyers need to have a few important qualities in order to be really good at what they do. If you have found yourself in a situation where you could need the help of a professional that has not only the necessary experience and knowledge but also that can offer you a fresh perspective on the legal matter, then see to this need by hiring a great lawyer. You might find the task of getting the best lawyer in town a bit overwhelming, but if you know what to look for, you will get the right help in no time.

The first thing that you need to take into consideration is the type of law that he practices. If you are in desperate need of a lawyer that knows all there is to know about DUI charges, then you should look for a Colorado DUI lawyer. Also, if you are facing criminal charges, then the best man for the job of defending you would be a Boulder criminal defense attorney. Why should you hire a lawyer that practices a certain kind of law? Well, if you want to make sure that you have the best shot of winning the case, then you need the help of an expert that only handles this sort of cases for a living. You can hire a family law lawyer to deal with criminal charges, but the results might not be exactly what you expected.

The next thing that you need to look for is a Boulder criminal defense attorney or a Colorado DUI lawyer that is honest. You will be able to see if he is the first time that you meet him and have a talk about your case. This means that if you feel like he is making unrealistic promises, then most probably he is not being honest and just wants another client. However, you can find a really good lawyer that is able to tell you what to expect from the legal procedures that are about to follow your meeting with him and how should you prepare for them.

Moreover, he can tell you exactly what he can do for you without promising that he will win the case. The next thing that you should take notice is the way he pays attention to you while you are talking about your charges. If he is talking on the phone or is not looking at you while you speak, then he can not be trusted. However, if he does pay attention, then this means that he is interested in every detail of your case and wants to make sure that he is able to find the best course of action. Do you need the help of an experienced Boulder criminal defense attorney or Colorado DUI lawyer? Then, you should look for one that has the qualities mentioned above. The great news is that you do not have to look too far. Make a click and contact the best lawyer in town!

Basic Laws Of Electronics

Thanks to the physical laws of electronics, circuit analysis is very procedural. This is the second entry in a tutorial in basic electronics. The first entry covered basic electronic concepts such as voltage, current, and power. This session will cover Ohm’s Law, and Kirchhoff’s Laws of voltage and current. These are the fundamental laws needed for circuit analysis and design.

Resistors and Ohm’s Law
Georg Simon Ohm was a German physicist that in 1826 experimentally determined most basic laws that relate to voltage and current for a resistor.

Ohm’s law basically states that the resistance of a component (commonly a resistor) is equal to the voltage dropped over the resistor divided by the current going through it.

This law makes it relatively easy to find one of three values: voltage across a resistance, the resistance value itself, or the current flowing through the resistance (as long as the other two values are known).

Nodes, Branches, and Loops
These three concepts must be understood for basic circuit analysis. They help determine if components are in series or parallel and if the components share the same current or have the same voltage drops.

A branch represents a single circuit component such as a resistor or voltage source.

A node is a point where two or more branches connect.

A loop is any closed path in a circuit.

Elements are in series if they exclusively share a single node. Elements that are in series share the same current.

Elements are in parallel if they are connected to the same two nodes. Elements in parallel have the same voltage across them.

Kirchhoff’s Laws
The first of Kirchhoff’s Laws is Kirchhoff’s current law (KCL). This law states that the sum of all current entering a node or enclosed area of a circuit is equal to zero. Simply put, current entering a node or area equals the current leaving the node or area.

The second of Kirchhoff’s Laws is Kirchhoff’s voltage law (KVL). This law states that the sum of all voltages around a closed path or loop is equal to zero. Simply put, the sum of voltage drops equals the sum of voltage rises.

This is found by following the loop in one direction (the direction does not matter). If the positive terminal is hit first, the voltage is added. If the negative terminal is hit first, the voltage is subtracted. Together these values will equal zero.

Once all of the voltages are found, we can start the loop anywhere we want. I find it convenient to start at the negative terminal of a main voltage source. Since we hit a negative terminal first, we subtract it. Now we simply finish the loop and add the voltages together.

This law comes in very handy for analysis.

Basic DC Analysis
By combining Kirchhoff’s voltage and current laws, basic DC circuits are relatively easy to analyze. Knowing that all voltages in a loop add up to zero and all currents entering a node, minus currents leaving a node also equals zero, most current and voltage values can be easily obtained.

If a loop contains one voltage source and multiple resistances, voltage division (eq. 1) should be used to find the value of voltage drops across the known resistances. Once the voltage across the known resistance is found, Ohm’s law (eq. 2) can be used to determine the current flowing through the resistance.

Eq.1 Voltage Division:
((voltage source in volts) (resistor of interest in ohms))/(sum of resistance in loop)

Eq.2 Ohm’s Law:
(voltage across a resistance) = (known resistance)(current flowing through resistance)

Keep in mind that resistors in series can be added to give total resistance between two nodes. The total resistance between two nodes that have resistors in parallel is found using eq. 3 below.

Eq. 3 Equivalent Resistance (Req) of Resistors in parallel:
Req = ((resistance in branch 1)(resistance in branch 2)) / (sum of resistances in both branches)

There is much more to be said about DC circuit analysis but most would go beyond the scope of this article. The purpose of this article is to give a basic understanding of the laws and concepts of basic electronics.

Other concepts that make DC circuit analysis easier are current division, mesh analysis, and nodal analysis. These techniques use the rules behind KVL, KCL, and Ohm’s Law but would require a visual example for thorough explanation.

I hope that this short tutorial has been helpful to anyone who is new to the world of electronics either as a hobbyist or as a technician trying to learn electronics repair.

The Penniless Attorney And His Obligation To Pay Child And Spousal Support

You know that paying child and spousal support is tough in California where even a high paid attorney complains about his support obligations. In the case of Marriage of Mosley, an attorney pleaded with the court to modify his monthly child and spousal support payments, claiming that he was financially destitute after making his payments.

After sorting out the interesting facts of this case, the Court of Appeal had to address two common issues: 1) how to apply bonus income to the support calculations; and 2) when to impute earning capacity to a party who insists on not working. I think you will find that the Court applied some common sense in rendering its decision.

The Initial Support Orders

Paul and Dawn Mosley were married for twenty years, lived in Orange County, and had five children. Both parties were licensed attorneys. Notably, Paul was a real estate lawyer during the recent real estate boom. Dawn, on the other hand, quit practicing law early on in the marriage to tend to their children. In 2002 the parties were divorced.

The parties’ 2002 Judgment of Dissolution ordered Paul to pay Dawn $6,810 per month and 21 % of all of his bonus income. The child support order was based on the fact that Paul earned $447,150 for the year 2001, which equated a gross monthly income of $32,175. Paul’s timeshare with the children was 32 percent (a factor considered by California’s guideline formula). No income was imputed to Dawn when support was calculated, since she was still unemployed and taking care of the minor children at the time the divorce was finalized.

Paul was also ordered to pay Dawn spousal support, in the amount of $4,100 per month, plus 15 percent of his bonus income. The spousal support order included a provision that the amount of support was insufficient to maintain the marital standard of living. The total amount of support (child and spousal combined), amounted to $10,910, plus 36% of all of Paul’s bonus income.

The Times, They are a Changing!

As Paul’s tax returns revealed, the practice of a real estate attorney was quite lucrative between 2000 and 2003. This chart shows Paul’s income (base salary and bonuses combined), for the listed years:

2000 – $529,652

2001 – $616,697

2002 – $689,215

2003 – $753,651

Unfortunately, the real estate market’s bubble burst. Paul found himself out of a job when his law firm phased out their real estate practice. In February, 2005, Paul took up a new job as in house counsel with a home builder. Paul’s new base salary was $205,000. However, his new compensation package provided that he could also earn a discretionary bonus of up to 150 percent of his base salary. In 2006 Paul filed an Order to Show Cause for modification of support, asserting that there was a material change of circumstances, warranting the court to modify the support orders.

Paul made several arguments in support of his request for modification of the support orders. He explained to the court that he was not capable of paying $10,910 monthly support as ordered, since his take home pay was often less than the amount he was ordered to pay. Paul declared that in the first two months of 2006, he paid Dawn more than the amount of his take home pay and borrowed all of his living expenses. In March, 2006 Paul received the remaining $85,000 of his 2005 bonus, most of which he used to reduce prior borrowings. He estimated that the remaining amount of his bonus would permit him to go two months longer before he would have to start borrowing again. Paul expected he would have to borrow 100 percent of his living expenses for the remaining six months of the year.

Paul also argued that the court should impute income to Dawn based on her earning capacity, since she had been given a Gavron warning (an advisement that she should make efforts to become self supporting), she was an attorney with impressive credentials, and based on her education and work history. Paul asserted that Dawn could earn at least $78,000 a year, and the court should impute those wages to her, in spite of the fact she was not working.

In opposition, Dawn argued that she could not afford a decrease in child or spousal support, since her monthly living expenses amounted to $10,000, and she was already living below the marital standard of living. Dawn also argued that the court should not impute wages to her, since she quit the practice of law several years ago, based on an agreement that she and Paul had entered into at the beginning of their marriage. Paul and Dawn had agreed that Dawn would stay home to take care of the kids, while Paul would go to work, and advance his career.

Finally, Dawn argued that the support orders should not be modified, since there was no showing that Paul’s income had actually decreased to the point where a modification was warranted. Dawn pointed out that Paul’s end of the year income for 2005 amounted to $448,392 (which included his base salary and bonus). Although his 2005 income was less than it had been in several years, it was greater than his base income of $447,150, as reflected in the 2002 judgment. Therefore, Dawn argued, there was no change of circumstances and Paul still had the ability to pay the court ordered support. The trial court denied Paul’s request for modification after determining that there was no change of circumstances warranting a reduction of support. In addition, the court refused to impute income to Dawn, reasoning that there was no showing that a job was available to her, and it was not in the best interest of the children for Dawn to work.

The Court of Appeal Weighs in

In a harshly worded decision, the Court of Appeal reversed and remanded the matter back to the trial court, ordering the court to recalculate child and spousal support, using Paul’s base salary, exclusive of his bonus income.

As the Court explained, “It exceeded the bounds of reason to require Paul to pay nearly 100 percent of his take home pay in support payments, on the assumption, based on only a one-year history with the home builder, that he would continue to receive a six-figure bonus each subsequent year. It placed him in a position of having to borrow for his living expenses, and thus resulted in a miscarriage of justice.” The court further reasoned that, “It would be an abuse of discretion for the court to leave Paul nearly penniless while he awaits the potential of a bonus each year, especially in light of the current plight of homebuilders.”

The Court of Appeal also held that the new order must include a different method for paying support based on Paul’s bonus income, citing In Re Marriage of Ostler and Smith (1990) 223 Cal.App.3rd 33, as follow: “No future bonus is guaranteed. It would therefore not be appropriate to base a support order on Husband’s bonus income and then require him to file motions to modify at such times as the bonus is reduced.” Instead, the Court suggested Paul pay Dawn a percentage of his bonus income, when he actually received it.

The Court of Appeal also directed the trial court to reconsider its ruling with respect to imputing income to Dawn, based on her earning capacity. While discussing Dawn’s earning capacity, the Court restated the law that a court may not impute earning capacity to a parent unless doing so is in the best interest of the children, citing In Re Marriage of Cheriton (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 269. The Court then held that the same principal applies to when a Court calculates spousal support, citing Family Code, Section 4320.

But the Court of Appeal held that the trial court failed to consider all of the evidence before it in evaluating the best interest of the children. The Court recalled Paul’s testimony that if Dawn contributed to the support of the children, he would not need to spend as much time at work trying to maximize his bonus and would be able to spend more time with the children himself.

Conclusion

It is important to note that where bonus income is at issue, the trial court has the discretion, to include bonus income to the paying parent’s gross monthly income. However, based on the Marriage of Mosley, we know that the trial court should not include bonus income in calculating the monthly payment, if there is not a sufficient track record to predict receipt of the bonus income for future years, and when the support payment will leave the party penniless.

How To Select An Employment Attorney Adhere To These Pointers

In the event of work-related disputes, you can seek the guidance of employment attorney because this matter can be quite intricate. As such, there are just several lawyers that are experts in this type of situation. To be sure that the lawyer that you are selecting will represent you competently, you must weigh your options cautiously in selecting a New York employment lawyer.

Experience and knowledge in dealing with employment related cases is the first factor that a plaintiff must think about when looking for employment attorneys. Apart from the years he had spent in the service, another factor to consider is if he handled the same case before. This will make certain that you are in the hands of an expert.

There will always be updates regarding the state and federal laws. Because of these changes, people choose employing employment attorneys NYC who are always updated with the alterations in employment laws. Chances that an employment-related litigation will flop are higher if your lawyer is offering advices based on outdated laws.

The attitude of the employment attorney is another thing that people need to assess. Lawyers often give free consultation during the initial meeting. This is an opportunity to evaluate if the lawyer genuinely cares about their customer, and believes in their cause. In situations when the New York employment attorney is showing low interests to their client’s case, there is a great possibility that the trial proceedings will be uninteresting. You can’t think of winning your case if the lawyer you hired is unsupportive and indifferent.

A personal meeting with employment lawyers is also the time to ask questions regarding the case. Well, it’s best to hear the legal explanations from a legal expert for you to understand it better. Considerably, these New York employment attorneys will make certain to offer you the written legal advice regarding your case. This written legal advice pinpoints the strengths and weaknesses of your case. This will help employees see the bigger picture of their case, and to stay prepared if they will be summoned for disciplinary meeting or tribunals.

For complex cases, it takes considerable time and resources before things are settled. Your employment lawyer must be transparent in giving a breakdown of his or her service fee. You can decide to choose to pay your lawyer hourly or base on contingency arrangement. And if there’s still a long way before your case can be settled, it’s far better to combine hourly and contingency payment. This way, it is feasible for a clientele to pay the fees of their employment lawyer NYC without depleting your financial resources.

As such, when you employ employment lawyers, ensure that the firm has a Lexcel or ISO 9001 accreditation. This type of accreditation signifies that the firm is providing the highest standard of case management.

Reasons A Social Security Attorney Is Worth Hiring

If you paid Social Security taxes throughout your life, you can be eligible to receive Social Security benefits for you and certain members of your family. In order to receive these benefits, you need to complete the application process. Of the thousands of people who apply every year, many of them get denied and end up needing to appeal the case. With statistics stacked against you, the application process can be a daunting one. There are Boise Social Security attorneys available to help you. Not only can this be a helpful way to go, but in many instances, it’s vital to getting your benefits. Here are 5 reasons that a lawyer would be worth hiring to help you:

1. Get Approved

When it comes to applying for Social Security, as much as half of all claims are denied the first time through the system. Most of these are denied due to technical reasons before the application is even reviewed. Your lawyer will make sure that there is no issues with your application that could prevent you from getting the benefits that you deserve. He or she will uncover evidence that could be provided to ensure that you receive your benefits in a timely fashion.

2. Offer Advice

As you’re applying for Social Security, you’ll have lots of forms to fill out and a process that you need to follow. There are lots of complicated laws that need to be followed, and the laws are always changing and evolving. Your lawyer will explain the laws and how they apply to your case, so you can make decisions that will impact your case for the better.

3. Expedite Process

Your Social Security benefits are important to you and your financial situation. You want to get the money that you deserve as quickly as possible. Your lawyer has the knowledge needed to make sure that there are no hang-ups in the process. He or she will expedite the process, so you can get the decision as quickly as possible and start enjoying the benefits associated with Social Security.

4. Provide Connections

Along the way, you may need to work with agency employees or others. When you’re working with an experienced lawyer, he or she should have made connections with people that can help your case. If you need to appeal your case, you’ll need to go before an Administrative Law judge. If your lawyer has a good rapport with these judges, he or she will know how to prepare for court and give you a better idea of what you can expect from the appeal.

5. Receive Peace of Mind

When your Social Security benefits are on the line, you want to know that you did all that you could to make sure that everything works out for you in the end. Hiring a lawyer to help you ensures that you’ll have the professional help that you need to get through the legal process and increase your chances of getting your Social Security benefits. It’s worth it to hire someone to help you to gain that peace of mind.

When hiring a Boise Social Security attorney, you should be aware that most of them will charge you based on a contingency fee. That means that you won’t owe any money to your lawyer until you’ve received your benefits, so you can be assured that he or she will work hard to make sure you receive the benefits that you deserve. Find someone that you will enjoy working with throughout the process and will elicit your confidence that everything will work out for your good.

Handling Fire Accident Lawsuit

In cases of fire accidents which can result to disfigurement and excruciating injuries to victims, it is important that a settlement or litigation should ensue right away in order to recover compensation from the other party.

Either it is an out-of-court settlement or litigation, families and victims are advised to seek assistance from personal injury litigators who can assess the amount of compensation to be demanded.

Also, these lawyers are capable of handling negotiations and presenting evidence which will prove their clients claims and accounts of the fire accident.

It is important for the plaintiff to establish that the defendant has a duty to provide reasonable care and that duty was breached because of negligence which resulted to the accident that produced damages on his end.

Common Sources of Fire Accidents

Fire accidents can happen to anyone, anywhere. They can occur while at a friends house or a company party on a yacht. There are lots of factors which can lead to these accidents and so we should all be wary of the following conditions:

Faulty electrical wirings Defects in the installation of wirings can lead to an explosion and fire accidents. These accidents can be prevented by having electrical technicians regularly checking the wires and power lines.

Defective machineries and equipments Manufacturers have liability over their products that malfunction and cause injuries and damages to consumers. So, it is important for consumers to check whether there are incident reports indicating malfunction before they purchase a product.

Hazardous property condition Each property is its owners responsibility and so its condition must never be taken for granted. Property owners must be able to predict and prevent accidents that might occur in their property especially if it is frequented by other people.

For victims of these accidents, it is important to file lawsuits as soon as possible so that the process for the recovery of compensation will also start immediately.

Disfigurement in Fire Accidents

One of the common damages that fire accidents leave their victims are scarring and disfigurement. Some of these injuries can still be corrected with painful surgery but on worse cases of burn injuries, the burnt area cannot be surgically corrected and so victims have to suffer life-long disfigurement and scarring.

Because of this, they can claim compensation for the pain and suffering that they will go through because of their condition. Also, there are instances when injuries from these accidents would leave victims with limbs that have been amputated to save their lives.

These conditions will compromise their way of living and means to earn income for their needs.

Personal Injury Lawyers

These experts represent the best interest of their clients and sees to it that compensatory damages get paid. So, in order to have successful claims, victims are encouraged to locate personal injury lawyers in their area.

Protect Your Legal Rights With A Colorado Personal Injury Lawyer

If you are injured not as the result of a deliberate criminal act in which case the perpetrator will (hopefully) be dealt with by the criminal justice system but as a result of someone else’s negligence, you need a Colorado personal injury lawyer. Whether it’s an auto accident, an injury caused by a defective consumer product or even a dog bite, a Colorado personal injury lawyer will help you to get the compensation you deserve.

The Denver Personal Injury Attorney’s Specialty

A Denver personal injury lawyer is one who specializes in the field of torts, which covers non-criminal, or civil disputes including personal injury and property loss. (If you’ve seen Judge Judy or similar TV programs, you understand that torts cover a lot of ground.) The origin of the word is from Norman French tortere, meaning to twist – but the concept predates the Normans by several centuries. Personal injury cases were common in Anglo-Saxon England since at least the 5th Century, and likely earlier. In the ancient Middle East, both Mosaic Law and the Code of Hammurabi deal with many of the same issues that today’s Denver personal injury attorney typically handles.

It’s Still Heard In Court Maybe

There are some similarities between criminal cases and those handled by a Colorado personal injury lawyer. Both may be heard by a judge and jury, or by a judge alone. There are also attempts in both situations to resolve cases without having to resort to the expense of a full trial. In criminal law, this is called a plea bargain; in torts, it’s called an out-of-court settlement, and is considered by most Denver personal injury lawyers to be the ideal situation. A good Denver personal injury lawyer can usually get an out-of-court settlement 95% of the time.

Denver Personal Injury Attorneys Provide Justice For All

If you are the victim of someone else’s negligence and have hesitated to contact a Colorado personal injury lawyer because of the potential cost, don’t. Today, most Denver personal injury attorneys will take cases on what is known as a contingency basis. This means that their fee comes out of whatever the court awards typically 30%. This also means that such Denver personal injury lawyers are extremely motivated to win your case and to seek maximum compensation. You will incur no out-of-pocket costs by hiring a Colorado personal injury lawyer, so protect your rights and contact one today.